The Time Traveler's Wife
This post is long overdue. Friends & Family - please just pass on through. I'm about to beat a horse with a dead stick. :-)
I'm not much of a reader. I'm spastic - something has to read like a John Hughes movie or I will have rejected it before it's even had a chance to gain momentum. Perfect example: Kite Runner. Another I am sludging through at the moment - is Animals in Translation. I mean, when Vern just swears up and down that I HAVE TO READ something, that there is no way in hell I WONT LIKE something, there's only the slightest bit of pressure that perhaps I'm just completely missing something. Or, that I need to put down the crack-pipe.
I get all weird when intelligent, smart, witty people I admire recommend books that I don't get. It makes me feel like running out and buying a Sweet Valley Twins book. (See, even at 12, Judy Bloom was like WAY over my head).
I'm still scratching my head over how No Country for Old Men won all the Oscars, when I thought it SUCKED? It was dry. It was boring. It was slow. None of the characters felt very developed to me. I didn't feel ANYTHING for ANYONE. It was lame.
Now. Juno? Brilliant. That Jesse James movie? Awesome. 3:10 to Yuma? A friggin' MASTERPIECE!
But this post isn't about movies, its about books that don't suck. Here are my personal kudos for one of the best books I have ever read. And why.
The Time Traveler's Wife: Audrey Neffenegger
I'm not much one for Fiction. If I am going to go out of my way to actually purchase a book (when I'd rather be purchasing YARN to KNIT), I usually gravitate towards Non-Fiction. I figure, why not actually learn something - because reading takes me so long, I feel like I need a little return on my investment. The Time Traveler's Wife, however, literally fell into my lap. My friend Travis left it on my desk one day at work - and I figured, what the hell. I was skeptical however, because he had just been talking about how it was 'sorta okay, but dragging towards the end'. If a book 'drags' for the professional reader - it will drown and then toss my limp body to the Childrens Corner of Barnes & Nobles - where I will be forced to play with Thomas The Train. Not a good sign. But whatever - the cover art was pretty. I'd give it the ol' college effort.
And it rocked my socks. While I struggled with the whole space-time relationships, the writing had completely won me over. It was like finding someone really attractive and making the first move while hoping that 'hotty' doesn't turn into a conceited asshole. I felt in-tuned to Audrey's writing in a way that I desperately wanted to 'get it'. I think much of a writer's obligation to his/her readers is in keeping them engaged. Content can be challenging, and I am willing to hold out for something great, but you have to give the reader something of a teaser. A bone. In this case, that was her writing style. The back and forth narratives between characters. The wonderfully blatant and colorful language. Her directness, and candor - read like a blog post to me. So as much as I knew this story was 'not real' - I believed in these characters because I had an immediate sense of them and how I could relate to their story.
Minus the time travel. But oddly, that never derailed me. I am that guy that points out inconsistencies in movies like 'Well, that can't happen'...or "The dress is blue and it was red two seconds ago - what the fuck?" or..."I thought this was supposed to be 1912, how can there be a Taco Bell Drive thru in this scene?". Its' the 'Debbie Downer' in me. I was on board. I thought, okay...I'll buy it for the sake of the story. And I did. And I also discovered quickly that if I could let go of trying to reconcile the whole grand time-line - I could embrace the bigger picture - which was magnificent. I have heard that for some people, the times when the older Henry visits the younger Clare, was awkward for them - which is something I never felt. And yet, the concept was so completely foreign - it maybe should have been a bit odd, but wasn't. It was beautiful. Romantic. Passionate. Exciting!
But maybe thats just because I turned over my cynicism from the get-go on a chance that this writer had something truly beautiful to reveal. And it worked. The book was everything you want in a good book. The only disappointment was, that when it was all over - I was devastated, yet exuberant. Wanting desperately to meet and discuss and express the myriad of feelings I felt. But - I missed the bandwagon. Everyone had read this thing years ago with Oprah when it first came out. So while I was crying and spewing about my friends were all:
"ummm, yeeeeeah. it was a good'er, sorry i don't remember much though. glad ya liked it!".
And then I bought a copy for everyone else for Christmas and demanded they enjoy it as much as I had. Vern included. Who probably was being nice when she said it was GRITE. Perhaps a generational thing - I think there is no telling what triggers inside people that makes them gravitate towards certain stories.
So the book - movie thing is going to happen. This year, I think. And I will be first in line. Although I was slightly bummed to read Eric Bana is playing the role of Henry. I hadn't ever thought about what actor resembled the character I had in my mind while reading it - but Eric Bana is not it. Nonetheless, I sincerely hope they do this book justice and I'm looking forward to the directors interpretation.
A++!









Recent Comments